Gluten cannot be absorbed through intact skin, so shampoo, body lotion and most cosmetics are not a celiac risk. What matters is anything that reaches the mouth: lipstick, lip balm, toothpaste, and hand products used before eating.
This category is dominated by marketing, and the honest version saves people a great deal of unnecessary expense and worry.
The real risk is anything that ends up in the mouth. Lipstick and lip balm are eaten in small quantities over the course of a day. Toothpaste and mouthwash are used in the mouth by definition. These are worth checking, and are the only cosmetics category where a gluten-free claim buys something concrete.
Hand products are the second real route, indirectly. Hand cream or hand sanitiser applied before eating with your hands can transfer to food. It is a small risk and an easy one to remove by washing hands before eating rather than by changing products.
Dermatitis herpetiformis, the skin manifestation of celiac disease, is often cited as a reason topical gluten must matter. It does not follow. DH is caused by ingested gluten producing IgA deposits in skin, not by gluten touching skin.
A separate and legitimate concern is contact dermatitis from wheat protein in someone with a wheat allergy, which is a different condition from celiac disease with a different mechanism. If your skin reacts to a product, take that seriously as an allergy question rather than a celiac one.
Point CiCi at the barcode and get this same reasoning in about two seconds, plus the carbs and whether it has been recalled. 360,000+ packaged foods are already read and waiting.
Sorted by what the answer actually is, rather than alphabetically — because the useful question in a shop is “which pile is this in.”
Not a cosmetic, but the same hand-to-mouth route, and children do ingest it.
Wheat by canonical requirement in some traditions. Low-gluten alternatives exist and are accepted in others.
Ingested in small amounts throughout the day. Worth checking.
Used in the mouth by definition. The one clear case for a gluten-free claim.
Only relevant if applied right before eating with your hands. Washing hands solves it.
Not eaten by you, but handled and airborne. Relevant mainly for people who handle it constantly.
Gluten does not cross intact skin. Not a celiac exposure.
Same reasoning.
No ingestion route.
Topical only.
No. Gluten is a large protein that does not pass through intact skin, and celiac disease is a reaction in the small intestine. Shampoo, conditioner and body lotion are not exposure routes, whatever their marketing says.
This is the one cosmetics category where checking is worthwhile, because lipstick and lip balm are ingested in small amounts over a day. Toothpaste and mouthwash are the other two.
It does not. Dermatitis herpetiformis is caused by ingested gluten producing IgA deposits in the skin, not by gluten touching the skin from outside. A separate wheat contact allergy is a real condition, but it is an allergy question rather than a celiac one.
This site answers the question you knew to ask. The app answers the one you didn't: the barley malt in a rice cereal, the wheat starch in a gummy. Scan the barcode, or photograph the panel when the barcode isn't in any database, and CiCi shows which words on the label produced the answer.
14 days free, then $29.99 a year. Cheaper than Fig, and it does what three separate apps do. This website stays free forever either way: every answer on it, permanently, with no account.