Yes, this is gluten free
Despite the name, maltodextrin has nothing to do with malt. It is almost always corn-derived in the US, and even wheat-derived maltodextrin is so thoroughly processed that the EU exempts it from allergen declaration.
EU Reg. 1169/2011 Annex II exemption.
A powder made by breaking starch down with acid or enzymes until the chains are short enough to dissolve but not short enough to taste properly sweet. It does almost every unglamorous job in processed food: bulking out a sachet of seasoning, stopping a powder clumping, carrying a flavour, thickening a low-fat dressing. That is why it turns up on so many labels, and why it is worth settling once rather than looking up every time.
The name. "Malt" in English food labelling nearly always means barley — malt extract, malt vinegar, malted milk — and barley is a gluten grain. Maltodextrin borrows the same prefix from maltose, the sugar that appears when you break starch apart, and has no connection to malted barley at all. A lot of people have put a packet back on the shelf over four letters.
On a packaged food with an FDA label, maltodextrin on its own is fine and needs no further thought. On anything meat, poultry or egg based the word alone does not settle it — if the product also carries a gluten-free claim you are covered by that instead, and if it does not, the manufacturer's customer line is the only real way to find out. Ringing them is less dramatic than it sounds: "is the maltodextrin in this wheat-derived?" is a question their food-safety team answers routinely.
Maltodextrin is one of the entries where the scanner does not simply look the word up. It checks which agency regulates the label first, because the honest answer changes with it — and where it cannot tell, it says "cannot verify" rather than taking the reassuring branch. That verdict is not the engine failing. It is the engine declining to tell you something the packet does not actually say.
Point CiCi at the barcode on the product you're holding and get this same reasoning in about two seconds, plus the carbs and the full nutrition panel. 360,000+ packaged foods are already read and waiting.
This answer comes from CiCi's ingredient lexicon — the same rules the scanner uses, not a separate article. Where reputable sources disagree, CiCi takes the conservative position and says so.